From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 01 06:53:24 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 141rYw-0007nB-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 06:53:22 -0800 Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 08:52:34 -0600 From: Steven Natinsky Subject: KX-T: Re: KXT123211 To: Sergio Campbell , kxt@kxthelp.com Message-id: <00dc01c05ba6$571a1600$2c55fea9@swbell.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 References: <20001201061255.6574.qmail@web1803.mail.yahoo.com> X-Priority: 3 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Sergio- The roms should be available from Valley National Distributors 888-201-4030. There are alot sources for older Panasonic parts, new and used. Here are three of them- Austin Telecom 512-258-2224 Advance Communication Products 800-234-8228 Communication Engineering 800-369-3631 Regards, Steven Natinsky Pace Comm, Inc. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sergio Campbell" To: Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 12:12 AM Subject: KX-T: KXT123211 > Hi pana guys; > > Got a question from the past..... > > I got a customer who still uses the old analog switch > and he is about to have an 64K tie line installed this > week for voice & data. > > He wants the voice to go into the system so he can use > his disa cadrs. My customer is very careful with his > switch and always keeps spare parts like line cards > and ext cards. > > So I am thinking he might ask me for a spare disa > card..and that's when i noticed nobody carries those > anymore. Yep, I need to know what happened to those > cards and if they are made at all now. I also might > need to upagrade the rom chips for a possible > voicemail app. Where can i order those? > > > t.i.a. > > > ===== > Sergio Campbell > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. > http://shopping.yahoo.com/ > > > ********************************************************* > * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * > * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * > ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 01 07:21:24 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 141s02-0007ni-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 07:21:22 -0800 Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 9:18 -0600 From: "Tony Peterson" To: "JTCOM2@aol.com" , "tomhoutx@wt.net" , "SurfSideSound@aol.com" Cc: "kxt@kxthelp.com" Subject: RE: KX-T: KXTD816-3 Upgrade Part 2 Message-ID: <20001201092046336-38165660@alltel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk For the 816-4 it should be the P311DA chipset. -----Original Message----- From: JTCOM2@aol.com at INTERNET Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:42 PM To: tomhoutx@wt.net at INTERNET; SurfSideSound@aol.com at INTERNET Cc: kxt@kxthelp.com at INTERNET Subject: RE: KX-T: KXTD816-3 Upgrade Part 2 P211D AND P212D ARE THE LATEST SHIPPING EPROM VERSION FOR KXTD1232 -4. I WILL CHECK TOMORROW WHAT IT SHOULD BE FOR KXTD816 SINCERELY, JOSEPH TORN << File: body.htm >> ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 01 07:40:32 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 141sIY-00000F-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 07:40:30 -0800 From: David Lesher Message-Id: <200012011544.KAA08314@sigma.nrk.com> Subject: KX-T: TVS100 -- user missing in action To: kxt@kxthelp.com (KXT Mailing list) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:44:46 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: wb8foz@nrk.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk I set up a new user on the KXT1232+TVS100. He recorded all the outgoing messages, set the PW, etc. You call the phone, it rings 3x, and answers in VM. But instead of his greeting, you get Ms. Default's voice. PRESS ONE TO, etc. I checked the class of service, all the mailbox options settable by the user, etc. and can not grok the difference from other folks. Suggestions? -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433 ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 01 07:57:40 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 141sZ9-00000k-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 07:57:39 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: john@mail.nas.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20001201092046336-38165660@alltel.com> References: <20001201092046336-38165660@alltel.com> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 07:56:21 -0800 To: kxt@kxthelp.com From: "John F. Coffey" Subject: RE: KX-T: KXTD816-3 Upgrade Part 2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk >For the 816-4 it should be the P311DA chipset. Hmmm, Okay .. Called the outfit I got the chips from this morning (their tech support is ONLY there 7-9 AM). They say there is only 1 upgrade chipset for the 816/1232 that they get from panasonic. They claim to have installed this in multiple 816 and never had a problem. They are sending me a new set of chips. Should be here Tuesday. > >P211D AND P212D ARE THE LATEST SHIPPING EPROM VERSION FOR KXTD1232 -4. >I WILL CHECK TOMORROW WHAT IT SHOULD BE FOR KXTD816 Joseph, Will still be interested in finding out what info you come up with. Thanks, --John -- -------------- John Coffey WWW - http://www.nas.com Network Access Services, Inc Email - john@nas.com P.O. Box 28085 Fax - (360)676-0345 Bellingham, WA 98228-0085 Voice - (360)733-9279 ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 01 14:34:22 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 141yl3-00004d-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:34:21 -0800 From: SurfSideSound@aol.com Message-ID: <68.9b45497.2759813b@aol.com> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 17:33:31 EST Subject: Re: KX-T: KXTD816-3 Upgrade Part 2 To: tomhoutx@wt.net CC: kxt@kxthelp.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_68.9b45497.2759813b_boundary" Content-Disposition: Inline X-Mailer: Unknown sub 148 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk --part1_68.9b45497.2759813b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That's what chipset is in my office TD1232, The chipset is usually a different for the TD816. So yes Tom, I'm saying the version should be a different number for the TD816 than the P211DA/P212DA chipset. Current version for the TD816 should be P311DA. Steve Martin Surf Side Sound, Inc. --part1_68.9b45497.2759813b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That's what chipset is in my office TD1232, The chipset is usually a
different for the TD816.  So yes Tom, I'm saying the version should be a
different number for the TD816 than the P211DA/P212DA chipset.  Current
version for the TD816 should be P311DA.

Steve Martin
Surf Side Sound, Inc. --part1_68.9b45497.2759813b_boundary-- ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 01 14:50:21 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 141z0W-00005B-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 14:50:20 -0800 From: SurfSideSound@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 17:49:30 EST Subject: Re: KX-T: KXT123211 To: campbellvoicedata@yahoo.com CC: kxt@kxthelp.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_ad.3b76cc6.275984fa_boundary" Content-Disposition: Inline X-Mailer: Unknown sub 148 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk --part1_ad.3b76cc6.275984fa_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit KX-T123291 DISA card is discontinued. You may find one secondary market. Try looking in a Telecom Gear, or TeleMart for suppliers. Upgrade was -3 version on the 123211D. Chips upgrades can be obtained from Valley National Distributors (VND). Steve Martin Surf Side Sound, Inc. --part1_ad.3b76cc6.275984fa_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit KX-T123291 DISA card is discontinued.  You may find one secondary market.  
Try looking in a Telecom Gear, or TeleMart for suppliers.

Upgrade was -3 version on the 123211D.  Chips upgrades can be obtained from
Valley National Distributors (VND).

Steve Martin
Surf Side Sound, Inc. --part1_ad.3b76cc6.275984fa_boundary-- ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 01 16:19:49 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 1420P6-00006B-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 16:19:48 -0800 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 13:01:44 -0600 From: Sergio Campbell Subject: KX-T: Account codes To: kxt@kxthelp.com Reply-to: Sergio Campbell Message-id: <003801c0557f$d35144a0$bd00000a@sergio> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0035_01C0554D.881FC4C0" X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Priority: 3 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C0554D.881FC4C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi guys, I programmed the kxtd1232 to verify-toll but system will not do it. Can = someone tell me the steps or condition to this. t.i.a.=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C0554D.881FC4C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hi guys,
 
I programmed the kxtd1232 to = verify-toll but system=20 will not do it. Can someone tell me the steps or condition=20 to this.
 
t.i.a. 
------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C0554D.881FC4C0-- ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 01 22:38:29 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 1426JX-00009B-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 22:38:27 -0800 From: Iudgin Subject: KX-T: Test To: kxt@kxthelp.com Message-Id: Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 22:38:23 -0800 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Just test ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Sat Dec 02 08:47:10 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 142Foa-0000HL-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 08:47:08 -0800 From: "Dan Padilla" To: "TERRY GUTHRIE" , "Shirley Padilla" , "sam phung" , "Rich Salter" , "Mark O'Connell" , "Mark Hunter" , "lo" , "Larry Arthur" , "kyle kiel" , "KXT Help" , "jim fainer" , "jean hunter" , "irene padilla" , "Geneau John" , "Frank Bohls" , "doug bowersox" , "Brent Liljestrom \(Work\)" , "Bob Douglas" <5584@cnmnetwork.com>, "Bill Abbott" Subject: KX-T: FW: Computer Virus Warning Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 08:47:34 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk -----Original Message----- From: Shirley.Bermudez@latimes.com [mailto:Shirley.Bermudez@latimes.com] Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 1:19 PM To: irenethequeen@yahoo.com; dcmartinez@aol.com; sbermudez@ocgsite.com Subject: Computer Virus Warning Just wanted to share this important message regarding another Virus Alert. ---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Bermudez/LATimes/TMC on 12/01/2000 01:15 PM --------------------------- Helpdesk 12/01/2000 11:04 AM To: Helpdesk/LATimes/TMC@LATimes cc: (bcc: Shirley Bermudez/LATimes/TMC) Subject: Computer Virus Warning VIRUS ALERT! Name of Virus: TROJ_SHOCKWAVE.A Aliases: Some virus scanners identify it as "W32/ProLin@MM" or "32.PROLIN.WORM" Description: Destructive worm that spreads using e-mail. E-mail subject line: "A great Shockwave flash movie." E-mail message body: "Check out this new flash movie that I downloaded just now...It's Great. Bye." Attachments: CREATIVE.EXE. What you need to do: DO NOT open the attachment. Delete the e-mail message. Call the Help Desk (213) 237-4357 to report it. What the IT Department is doing: The virus scanners for mail from the Internet and from other Tribune properties have been updated and are catching this virus. All other e-mail virus scanners will be updated as soon as the updates are available. Symptoms: Arrives as an e-mail message, sent automatically by the worm. Risk assessment: Medium What kind of damage can be done: When CREATIVE.EXE is executed, it goes through the Outlook address book and sends an e-mail to everyone on the list. It then puts CREATIVE.EXE in your Windows Startup folder so that it runs every time you start Windows. It also sends an e-mail to a Yahoo mail account set up by the author of the worm, with the body, "Got yet another idiot," for the purpose of notifying the author that your system has been infected. The worm searches for .JPG and .ZIP files, moves them all to the root directory C:\, then renames them with the extension "change at least now to LINUX." Finally, it drops a text file into the root directory called "messageforu.txt," which contains the following text: "Hi, guess you have got the message. I have kept a list of files that I have infected under this. If you are smart enough just reverse back the process. i could have done far better damage, i could have even completely wiped your harddisk. Remember this is a warning & get it sound and clear... - The Penguin" Additional technical information: http://www.nai.com or http://www.symantec.com ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Sun Dec 03 07:08:30 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 142ake-0000Va-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 07:08:28 -0800 Message-ID: <001301c05d3a$cd98bf80$14283ccc@james.a.schultz> From: "jimschultz" To: "Pana Help" Subject: KX-T: CID on TA624 Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 10:07:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Hi Pholks! Can anyone tell me how to get the CID info to log automatically on jack 01? This is driving me nuts.....I usually work on the digital stuff and am trying to do a "favor" for a customer who moved into a house with an existing TA 624 system. Thanks in advance. Jim ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Sun Dec 03 15:18:03 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 142iOQ-0000ZX-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 15:18:02 -0800 Message-ID: <20001203231740.15517.qmail@web1804.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 15:17:40 -0800 (PST) From: Sergio Campbell Subject: KX-T: Once Again To: kxt@kxthelp.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk hi guys: Don't now if you guys received my question so here it is again. I tried to make the kxtd1232 verify toll calls but could not. At this point any sugestion is helpful. t.i.a. ===== Sergio Campbell __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Sun Dec 03 22:14:02 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 142osz-0000cq-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 22:14:01 -0800 From: "Dan Padilla" To: "KXT Help" Subject: KX-T: FW: Computer Virus Warning Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 22:16:26 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk -----Original Message----- From: David Newall [mailto:davidn@rebel.net.au] Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 5:29 AM To: Dan Padilla Subject: Re: Computer Virus Warning >Must you send such blatantly off-topic messages to the KXT list? Very few >of us even use a MS operating system on our KXT's, let alone do so in a way >that makes us susceptible to that particular virus. I'm sure you thought >you were performing a community service, and so you were, but a misguided >one. If everybody did as you did the internet would quickly become clogged >with virus warnings. Let people hear about these things from their >preferred channels, huh? wow David Newall, i went back and read my original message that i had forwarded and timed myself. it, took me 2 minutes and 40 seconds to read it! i then felt bad that i had forwarded this off-topic message to you and all others on this list and made them waste 2 minutes and 40 seconds. i shall now just forward these type of messages to my "virus warning" chat group only. David Newall-did you know it takes 2 minutes and 40 seconds to read this page, weird huh? dp ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Sun Dec 03 22:15:58 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 142our-0000d9-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 22:15:57 -0800 From: "Dan Padilla" To: "KXT Help" Subject: FW: KX-T: FW: Computer Virus Warning Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 22:18:20 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk yeah, whatever mark.dp -----Original Message----- From: mark@markds3.com [mailto:mark@markds3.com] Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 7:42 AM To: Dan Padilla Subject: RE: KX-T: FW: Computer Virus Warning Thanks VERY much for the warning... although for me, it came two days too late. I got this virus on Fri Dec 1st. It is very fast moving. I'm glad to know more about the virus because of the info contained in your email.... now I know what to clean up and clean out of my system. Thanks again Dan, for the forward. Mark <><><> ><><>< <><><> -----Original Message----- From: owner-kxt@nccom.com [mailto:owner-kxt@nccom.com]On Behalf Of Dan Padilla Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 11:48 AM To: TERRY GUTHRIE; Shirley Padilla; sam phung; Rich Salter; Mark O'Connell; Mark Hunter; lo; Larry Arthur; kyle kiel; KXT Help; jim fainer; jean hunter; irene padilla; Geneau John; Frank Bohls; doug bowersox; Brent Liljestrom (Work); Bob Douglas; Bill Abbott Subject: KX-T: FW: Computer Virus Warning -----Original Message----- From: Shirley.Bermudez@latimes.com [mailto:Shirley.Bermudez@latimes.com] Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 1:19 PM To: irenethequeen@yahoo.com; dcmartinez@aol.com; sbermudez@ocgsite.com Subject: Computer Virus Warning Just wanted to share this important message regarding another Virus Alert. ---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Bermudez/LATimes/TMC on 12/01/2000 01:15 PM --------------------------- Helpdesk 12/01/2000 11:04 AM To: Helpdesk/LATimes/TMC@LATimes cc: (bcc: Shirley Bermudez/LATimes/TMC) Subject: Computer Virus Warning VIRUS ALERT! Name of Virus: TROJ_SHOCKWAVE.A Aliases: Some virus scanners identify it as "W32/ProLin@MM" or "32.PROLIN.WORM" Description: Destructive worm that spreads using e-mail. E-mail subject line: "A great Shockwave flash movie." E-mail message body: "Check out this new flash movie that I downloaded just now...It's Great. Bye." Attachments: CREATIVE.EXE. What you need to do: DO NOT open the attachment. Delete the e-mail message. Call the Help Desk (213) 237-4357 to report it. What the IT Department is doing: The virus scanners for mail from the Internet and from other Tribune properties have been updated and are catching this virus. All other e-mail virus scanners will be updated as soon as the updates are available. Symptoms: Arrives as an e-mail message, sent automatically by the worm. Risk assessment: Medium What kind of damage can be done: When CREATIVE.EXE is executed, it goes through the Outlook address book and sends an e-mail to everyone on the list. It then puts CREATIVE.EXE in your Windows Startup folder so that it runs every time you start Windows. It also sends an e-mail to a Yahoo mail account set up by the author of the worm, with the body, "Got yet another idiot," for the purpose of notifying the author that your system has been infected. The worm searches for .JPG and .ZIP files, moves them all to the root directory C:\, then renames them with the extension "change at least now to LINUX." Finally, it drops a text file into the root directory called "messageforu.txt," which contains the following text: "Hi, guess you have got the message. I have kept a list of files that I have infected under this. If you are smart enough just reverse back the process. i could have done far better damage, i could have even completely wiped your harddisk. Remember this is a warning & get it sound and clear... - The Penguin" Additional technical information: http://www.nai.com or http://www.symantec.com ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Sun Dec 03 22:37:07 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 142pFK-0000dg-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 22:37:06 -0800 From: David Lesher Message-Id: <200012040640.BAA12565@sigma.nrk.com> Subject: Re: KX-T: FW: Computer Virus Warning To: kxt@kxthelp.com (KXT Mailing list) Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 01:40:48 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: from "Dan Padilla" at Dec 03, 2000 10:16:26 PM Reply-To: wb8foz@nrk.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk If you want to help out on the virus problem, start practicing Safe Computing. Use a text mailer, not a HTML, ms-tref, VBS executing one. Don't use a www bowser for a mailer... NEVER accept executables. Don't run JavaVirus, VBS, or RadioActive X. If you feel compelled to preach about viruses; do so by pointing to a vouchsafed page, such as CERT's.... -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433 ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Mon Dec 04 01:55:17 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 142sL6-0000fM-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 01:55:16 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: augustus.tellurian.com.au: davidn owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 20:46:09 +1030 (CST) From: David Newall To: Dan Padilla cc: KXT Help Subject: Re: KX-T: FW: Computer Virus Warning In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Danny boy! I sent you a nice private email; why did you go and forward it to a public mailing list? I was trying to chastise you, and in a nice way, in private, because that has to be less embarrassing for you than having it brought up in public. Just remember: *I* didn't put this on list; you did (and doing so impolite, and probably breaches copyright, not that I care this time.) Two and half minutes from you, and the same from everybody else on the list, because after all if it's okay for you to do it then surely everybody can. Multiply that by half a dozen lists and it takes days to wade through all the stuff. Rhetoric aside, listen to what I said: The virus warning is off-topic. It has nothing to do with KXTs. Send it to virus-warning-list, if you must. Send it to CERT. But don't send it to this list. There are channels for dissemination of virus warnings, and this is not one of them. You apparently believed it to be a timely warning to the world, but that is NOT a generally accepted excuse for ignoring netiquette. Thanks, David -----Original Message----- Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 22:16:26 -0800 From: Dan Padilla To: KXT Help Subject: KX-T: FW: Computer Virus Warning -----Original Message----- From: David Newall [mailto:davidn@rebel.net.au] Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 5:29 AM To: Dan Padilla Subject: Re: Computer Virus Warning >Must you send such blatantly off-topic messages to the KXT list? Very few >of us even use a MS operating system on our KXT's, let alone do so in a way >that makes us susceptible to that particular virus. I'm sure you thought >you were performing a community service, and so you were, but a misguided >one. If everybody did as you did the internet would quickly become clogged >with virus warnings. Let people hear about these things from their >preferred channels, huh? wow David Newall, i went back and read my original message that i had forwarded and timed myself. it, took me 2 minutes and 40 seconds to read it! i then felt bad that i had forwarded this off-topic message to you and all others on this list and made them waste 2 minutes and 40 seconds. i shall now just forward these type of messages to my "virus warning" chat group only. David Newall-did you know it takes 2 minutes and 40 seconds to read this page, weird huh? dp ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Mon Dec 04 02:43:23 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 142t5e-0000gV-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 02:43:22 -0800 From: Manish Hira Subject: KX-T: Naming of Extensions via Digital Handset To: kxt@kxthelp.com Message-Id: Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 02:43:19 -0800 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Hi Folks, First post to the mailing list. I am wondering if it is possible to change the name of the extensions via a Panasonic Digital Handset, instead of calling our PBX installer to do this. For example change Ext 102 from Bob to James? Handset is Pansonic KX-T7230 PBX is Pansonic KX-T816SA Thanks for your help Manish ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Mon Dec 04 05:13:05 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 142vQW-0000ky-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 05:13:04 -0800 Message-ID: <004301c05df3$e067a9a0$0200a8c0@u9h9i3> From: "Randy Dell" To: Subject: Fw: KX-T: Naming of Extensions via Digital Handset Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 05:12:38 -0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Here in the US, and with any of the later firmware releases, you can, from any phone with a display dial Program **(password) usually (1234). The display will then say USR-PGM NO? . The number to change the name of a phone is 004. Then the system will ask for the jack number. For 102 you usually would enter 02 for 110 you would usually enter 10. Then explanation of how to do this is in your User Guide, if your programmer left it for you. Good Luck rd -----Original Message----- From: Manish Hira To: kxt@kxthelp.com Date: Monday, December 04, 2000 2:53 AM Subject: KX-T: Naming of Extensions via Digital Handset >Hi Folks, > >First post to the mailing list. I am wondering if it is possible to change the name of the extensions via a Panasonic Digital Handset, instead of calling our PBX installer to do this. For example change Ext 102 from Bob to James? > >Handset is Pansonic KX-T7230 >PBX is Pansonic KX-T816SA > >Thanks for your help >Manish > > > > ********************************************************* > * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * > * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * > ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Mon Dec 04 09:40:14 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 142zb3-0000oj-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:40:13 -0800 From: "Dan Padilla" To: "KXT Help" , "David Newall" Subject: RE: KX-T: FW: Computer Virus Warning Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:42:41 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-reply-to: Importance: Normal Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk o.k. -----Original Message----- From: owner-kxt@nccom.com [mailto:owner-kxt@nccom.com]On Behalf Of David Newall Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 2:16 AM To: Dan Padilla Cc: KXT Help Subject: Re: KX-T: FW: Computer Virus Warning Danny boy! I sent you a nice private email; why did you go and forward it to a public mailing list? I was trying to chastise you, and in a nice way, in private, because that has to be less embarrassing for you than having it brought up in public. Just remember: *I* didn't put this on list; you did (and doing so impolite, and probably breaches copyright, not that I care this time.) Two and half minutes from you, and the same from everybody else on the list, because after all if it's okay for you to do it then surely everybody can. Multiply that by half a dozen lists and it takes days to wade through all the stuff. Rhetoric aside, listen to what I said: The virus warning is off-topic. It has nothing to do with KXTs. Send it to virus-warning-list, if you must. Send it to CERT. But don't send it to this list. There are channels for dissemination of virus warnings, and this is not one of them. You apparently believed it to be a timely warning to the world, but that is NOT a generally accepted excuse for ignoring netiquette. Thanks, David -----Original Message----- Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 22:16:26 -0800 From: Dan Padilla To: KXT Help Subject: KX-T: FW: Computer Virus Warning -----Original Message----- From: David Newall [mailto:davidn@rebel.net.au] Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 5:29 AM To: Dan Padilla Subject: Re: Computer Virus Warning >Must you send such blatantly off-topic messages to the KXT list? Very few >of us even use a MS operating system on our KXT's, let alone do so in a way >that makes us susceptible to that particular virus. I'm sure you thought >you were performing a community service, and so you were, but a misguided >one. If everybody did as you did the internet would quickly become clogged >with virus warnings. Let people hear about these things from their >preferred channels, huh? wow David Newall, i went back and read my original message that i had forwarded and timed myself. it, took me 2 minutes and 40 seconds to read it! i then felt bad that i had forwarded this off-topic message to you and all others on this list and made them waste 2 minutes and 40 seconds. i shall now just forward these type of messages to my "virus warning" chat group only. David Newall-did you know it takes 2 minutes and 40 seconds to read this page, weird huh? dp ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Mon Dec 04 09:47:25 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 142zhz-0000pB-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:47:23 -0800 From: To: "Dan Padilla" , "KXT Help" Subject: RE: KX-T: FW: Computer Virus Warning Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:48:07 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Dan, I appreciated the Virus info. (I had rec'd the Virus shortly before your email.) Your email about the Virus helped me. Thanks for putting it on the list. Mark <><><> ><><>< <><><> -----Original Message----- From: owner-kxt@nccom.com [mailto:owner-kxt@nccom.com]On Behalf Of Dan Padilla Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 1:16 AM To: KXT Help Subject: KX-T: FW: Computer Virus Warning -----Original Message----- From: David Newall [mailto:davidn@rebel.net.au] Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 5:29 AM To: Dan Padilla Subject: Re: Computer Virus Warning >Must you send such blatantly off-topic messages to the KXT list? Very few >of us even use a MS operating system on our KXT's, let alone do so in a way >that makes us susceptible to that particular virus. I'm sure you thought >you were performing a community service, and so you were, but a misguided >one. If everybody did as you did the internet would quickly become clogged >with virus warnings. Let people hear about these things from their >preferred channels, huh? wow David Newall, i went back and read my original message that i had forwarded and timed myself. it, took me 2 minutes and 40 seconds to read it! i then felt bad that i had forwarded this off-topic message to you and all others on this list and made them waste 2 minutes and 40 seconds. i shall now just forward these type of messages to my "virus warning" chat group only. David Newall-did you know it takes 2 minutes and 40 seconds to read this page, weird huh? dp ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Mon Dec 04 09:59:36 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 142ztn-0000pX-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:59:35 -0800 From: "Dan Padilla" To: "KXT Help" Subject: RE: KX-T: Naming of Extensions via Digital Handset Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:02:00 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-reply-to: Importance: Normal Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk request from your pbx installer the "manager" programming section, about 20 pages.all instructions you need are included. -----Original Message----- From: owner-kxt@nccom.com [mailto:owner-kxt@nccom.com]On Behalf Of Manish Hira Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 2:43 AM To: kxt@kxthelp.com Subject: KX-T: Naming of Extensions via Digital Handset Hi Folks, First post to the mailing list. I am wondering if it is possible to change the name of the extensions via a Panasonic Digital Handset, instead of calling our PBX installer to do this. For example change Ext 102 from Bob to James? Handset is Pansonic KX-T7230 PBX is Pansonic KX-T816SA Thanks for your help Manish ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Tue Dec 05 07:22:24 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143JvD-00014Q-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 07:22:23 -0800 From: guest Subject: KX-T: test To: kxt@kxthelp.com Message-Id: Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 07:22:20 -0800 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk just testing ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Tue Dec 05 12:25:26 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143OeS-00016y-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 12:25:24 -0800 Message-ID: <000e01c05efa$aa536180$0b94533f@dicomm-4> From: "Kerry Smith" To: "Sergio Campbell" , Subject: Re: KX-T: Once Again Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:33:42 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Sergio, You need to setup toll restrictions on the stations, programs 300-310,332,333, 500-501 after you have toll restrictions set then program your account codes and folow the user's guide for Verified Toll. -----Original Message----- From: Sergio Campbell To: kxt@kxthelp.com Date: Sunday, December 03, 2000 5:26 PM Subject: KX-T: Once Again >hi guys: > >Don't now if you guys received my question so here it >is again. > >I tried to make the kxtd1232 verify toll calls but >could not. At this point any sugestion is helpful. > >t.i.a. > >===== >Sergio Campbell > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. >http://shopping.yahoo.com/ > > > ********************************************************* > * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * > * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * > ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Tue Dec 05 21:36:07 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143XFO-0001Bv-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 21:36:06 -0800 Message-ID: <3A2DD1FF.C77787A6@ticnet.com> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 23:43:27 -0600 From: larry X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kxt@kxthelp.com Subject: KX-T: T1 - test box Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk I am setting up a used Carrier Access Corp Access Bank I to test T1 on TD-1232's with td-187 cards in the shop. Anyone in the group have any used FXO cards they want to sell? I need 2. Also have FXS cards to swap if you need that flavor card for your box. With all the upgrading going on, there has to be a lot of -0 and -1 TD1232's being sold out there. How much are you guys getting for them? How much do you allow for trade in? Thanks - Larry ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Tue Dec 05 23:16:32 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143YoY-0001Cv-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:16:30 -0800 Message-ID: <703C529E483BD311B44600A0C9D1893C3B1C15@mail.redbrigade.co.za> From: Manish Hira To: kxt@kxthelp.com Subject: RE: KX-T: Naming of Extensions via Digital Handset Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:15:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk A warm hello to Dan and the other great members of this extremely helpful mailing list. Just spoke to our PBX Company. Were they amazed when I told them that I just changed the name of two extensions via a digital handset. Visiting another great site IMHO, http://www.ablecomm.com put me in the right direction as how to do this. Now I understand that I have to enter System Programming mode, I have to type Program, *,#,1234 To change extension name, the code 004 is needed. However, to add another phone to do programming, the code 006 is needed. Now if I want Extension 104 to be able to program the system in addition to Extension 101, how would I tell the system. I tried entering 104 but all it would accept is 04. Which doesn't work. How do I do this. Please note, that I do not have the manual, since our PBX company maintain that they left it when they installed the system 2 years ago (although I don't trust them anymore). These are the only two functions that I wish to know about the system. Your help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a gazillion. Manish (who hope he'll be able to help one day) -----Original Message----- From: Dan Padilla [mailto:powercom@ix.netcom.com] Sent: 04 December 2000 23:12 To: Manish Hira Subject: RE: KX-T: Naming of Extensions via Digital Handset any company that is good at this business doesn't need to charge you 60 or 70 bucks to change names. that is why it is called "manager programming", so you can manage it! dp -----Original Message----- From: Manish Hira [mailto:ManishH@redbrigade.co.za] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 12:12 PM To: 'Dan Padilla ' Subject: RE: KX-T: Naming of Extensions via Digital Handset Thanks for the tip. When I asked them if it was possible, they said that it could only be done by them... liars... -----Original Message----- From: Dan Padilla To: KXT Help Sent: 04/12/2000 20:02 PM Subject: RE: KX-T: Naming of Extensions via Digital Handset request from your pbx installer the "manager" programming section, about 20 pages.all instructions you need are included. -----Original Message----- From: owner-kxt@nccom.com [mailto:owner-kxt@nccom.com]On Behalf Of Manish Hira Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 2:43 AM To: kxt@kxthelp.com Subject: KX-T: Naming of Extensions via Digital Handset Hi Folks, First post to the mailing list. I am wondering if it is possible to change the name of the extensions via a Panasonic Digital Handset, instead of calling our PBX installer to do this. For example change Ext 102 from Bob to James? Handset is Pansonic KX-T7230 PBX is Pansonic KX-T816SA Thanks for your help Manish ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* This e-mail message was created on a RedBrigade-owned computer system and is considered to be an internal business document subject to review as authorized by corporate policy. The content of any response to this message is considered to be a continuation of the original business document and is also subject to review. This e-mail message was created on a RedBrigade-owned computer system and is considered to be an internal business document subject to review as authorized by corporate policy. The content of any response to this message is considered to be a continuation of the original business document and is also subject to review. ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Wed Dec 06 07:37:01 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143gcu-0001Jr-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 07:37:00 -0800 Message-id: Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 10:34:18 -0500 Subject: Re: RE: KX-T: Naming of Extensions via Digital Handset To: ManishH@redbrigade.co.za Cc: kxt@kxthelp.com From: "James C. Strickler" References: <703C529E483BD311B44600A0C9D1893C3B1C15@mail.redbrigade.co.za> In-Reply-To: <703C529E483BD311B44600A0C9D1893C3B1C15@mail.redbrigade.co.za> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Manish: Enter System Programming mode: type Program, *,#,1234 To add a Manager, Display: SYS-PGM NO? 1) Enter 006 Display: OPE-1, 2, MGR 2)Press NEXT Display OPE-1:JACK01 3)Press NEXT Display OPE-2:JACK 4)Press NEXT Display MNGER:JACK 5)Enter 04 (or whatever JACK# you wish to assign MANAGER capabalities) 6)Press STORE Remember, only a manager can do programing; OPERATORS CAN NOT do programing. James ManishH@redbrigade.co.za writes: >However, to add another phone to do programming, the code 006 is needed. >Now if I want Extension 104 to be able to program the system in addition >to >Extension 101, how would I tell the system. I tried entering 104 but all >it >would accept is 04. Which doesn't work. >How do I do this. ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Wed Dec 06 08:00:54 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143h00-0001KN-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 08:00:52 -0800 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20001206105945.00a2cc88@wcnet.org> X-Sender: cnavarro@wcnet.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 10:59:45 -0500 To: kxt@kxthelp.com From: Carl Navarro Subject: KX-T: KXT 4000 cordless stuff... In-Reply-To: References: <703C529E483BD311B44600A0C9D1893C3B1C15@mail.redbrigade.co.za> <703C529E483BD311B44600A0C9D1893C3B1C15@mail.redbrigade.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk I have been sleeping for 6 months or so. What's the deal on the 4000 cordless stuff? Apparently you shell out $500 for a handset and base and then about $150 retail for additional handsets. It gives you 4 lines and a totally wireless system with CID. Now I ask: 1) Range 2) Sound quality 3) features between handsets Anybody sold or used one yet? Carl (Rip Van Winkle) Navarro > ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Wed Dec 06 08:58:52 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143hu7-0001L3-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 08:58:51 -0800 Message-ID: <001901c05f8d$fea00020$bc00a8c0@Charles> Reply-To: "Charles@telephonesecurity.com" From: "Charles@telephonesecurity.com" To: , "James C. Strickler" Cc: References: <703C529E483BD311B44600A0C9D1893C3B1C15@mail.redbrigade.co.za> Subject: Re: RE: KX-T: Naming of Extensions via Digital Handset Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:08:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Manish, One point to remember is that the programming is asking for the "jack number", not the extension number. Jack 04 is usually ext. 104 but it could be different if the ext. numbers were changed. charles ----- Original Message ----- From: "James C. Strickler" To: Cc: Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 10:34 AM Subject: Re: RE: KX-T: Naming of Extensions via Digital Handset > Manish: > > Enter System Programming mode: > type > Program, *,#,1234 > > To add a Manager, > Display: SYS-PGM NO? > > 1) Enter 006 > Display: OPE-1, 2, MGR > > 2)Press NEXT > Display OPE-1:JACK01 > > 3)Press NEXT > Display OPE-2:JACK > > 4)Press NEXT > Display MNGER:JACK > > 5)Enter 04 (or whatever JACK# you wish to assign MANAGER capabalities) > > 6)Press STORE > > Remember, only a manager can do programing; OPERATORS CAN NOT do > programing. > > James > > > > ManishH@redbrigade.co.za writes: > >However, to add another phone to do programming, the code 006 is needed. > >Now if I want Extension 104 to be able to program the system in addition > >to > >Extension 101, how would I tell the system. I tried entering 104 but all > >it > >would accept is 04. Which doesn't work. > >How do I do this. > > > > > ********************************************************* > * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * > * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * > ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Wed Dec 06 09:09:11 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143i46-0001LR-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:09:10 -0800 Message-ID: <002301c05f8f$6e1c89e0$bc00a8c0@Charles> Reply-To: "Charles Patterson" From: "Charles Patterson" To: "KXT Help" Subject: KX-T: KXTD308 and cid Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:18:34 -0500 Organization: Global Communications MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk I just put in my second D308 but my first with the caller id card and I have a couple of questions. Is anything special needed to get the caller id to work? I turned it on for each co, but the customer doesn't have it yet from the telco so I couldn't test it. Has anyone successfully connected a modem to one? I installed an external modem then I realized that Pana's software doesn't allow modem dialing. I had recently reformated my laptop and didn't have the Programmator installed yet. Also, what is the little jumper clip included for? Charles Charles Patterson Global Communications Tarrytown, NY charles+AEA-telephonesecurity.com http://www.telephonesecurity.com ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Wed Dec 06 09:28:07 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143iMP-0001Lu-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:28:05 -0800 From: "Tony Weiner" To: "KXT Help" Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:20:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: KX-T: 624 chipset Reply-to: tony.weiner@mindspring.com Message-ID: <3A2E2F03.29773.51C0D7@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <002301c05f8f$6e1c89e0$bc00a8c0@Charles> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk What is the current firmware release for the KXT-624? Where is a good place to get it from? In the simpler old days you could send panasonic tech a blank Eprom and they would exchange it for a programmed one. I suppose that, that does not happen anymore. Thanks, Tony Weiner P.C.S., Inc. Mamaroneck, NY 10543 914 698-3689 ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Wed Dec 06 12:52:06 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143lXp-0001NU-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:52:05 -0800 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:51:57 -0500 (EST) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem Message-Id: <200012062051.PAA18799@smtp6.mindspring.com> To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="PAA18799.976135917/smtp6.mindspring.com" Subject: KX-T: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: nospamingtheatrix.net: host not found) Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk This is a MIME-encapsulated message --PAA18799.976135917/smtp6.mindspring.com The original message was received at Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:51:54 -0500 (EST) from bsg-ma1c-196.ix.netcom.com [209.110.250.196] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 550 ... Host unknown (Name server: nospamingtheatrix.net: host not found) --PAA18799.976135917/smtp6.mindspring.com Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp6.mindspring.com Received-From-MTA: DNS; bsg-ma1c-196.ix.netcom.com Arrival-Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:51:54 -0500 (EST) Final-Recipient: RFC822; brucek@NOSPAMINGtheatrix.net Action: failed Status: 5.1.2 Remote-MTA: DNS; nospamingtheatrix.net Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:51:57 -0500 (EST) --PAA18799.976135917/smtp6.mindspring.com Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: Received: from homeoffice (bsg-ma1c-196.ix.netcom.com [209.110.250.196]) by smtp6.mindspring.com (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA09929 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:51:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by homeoffice with XtraMail-SMTP/POP3-Server (v1.2 48220008333) for at Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:14:12 +-500 From: postmaster@theatrix.net To: brucek@NOSPAMINGtheatrix.net Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:14:12 +-500 Subject: Delivery unsuccesful: Delivery problems Message-Id: <001206151412133@homeoffice> --------------- The following address has delivery problems: kxt@kxthelp.com --------------- Part of transaction follows: --> MAIL FROM: <-- 450 ... Sender domain not compliant with RFC 822, section 6.2.7 --------------- Original Message: Received: by homeoffice with XtraMail-SMTP/POP3-Server (v1.2 48220008333) for at Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:14:09 +-500 Message-ID: <001001c05fc6$66d56bc0$061ba8c0@repair> From: "brucek@theatrix.net" To: Subject: help with programming tool Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:52:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000D_01C05F9C.7DE57320" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C05F9C.7DE57320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable i have a machine that has been upgraded to windows ME. I now can not = connect using the Panasonic tool: When I try to connect using COM1, it = plugs and chugs and says " DSHS Connect error." If i try to connect = again, it immediately gives me a "Communication port initialize error." = Anyone have any clues?? It used to work just fine. btw, COM1=3D03F8, = IRQ 04. I can still connect to the VMS with COM1. thanks bk =20 ----------------------------------------------------- Bruce Klotz THEATRIX, = Inc.=20 =20 Brucek@NOSPAMINGtheatrix.net 636 Daniel Shays Hwy (Remove NOSPAMING) Belchertown, MA 01007 =20 [413] 323-7803 x13 (Voice) WWW.THEATRIX.NET [413] 323-7805 (FAX) =20 ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C05F9C.7DE57320 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
i have a machine that has been upgraded = to windows=20 ME.  I now can not connect using the Panasonic tool:  When I = try to=20 connect using COM1, it plugs and chugs and says " DSHS Connect=20 error."   If i try to connect again, it immediately gives me a = "Communication port initialize error."  Anyone have any = clues??  It=20 used to work just fine.  btw, COM1=3D03F8, IRQ 04.
 
I can still connect to the VMS with=20 COM1.
 
thanks
bk
 
-----------------------------------------------------<= BR>Bruce=20 Klotz           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 THEATRIX,=20 Inc. 
          = ;            =            =20
     Brucek@NOSPAMINGtheatrix.net=            &nb= sp;  =20 636 Daniel Shays Hwy
   (Remove=20 NOSPAMING)          &nb= sp;           &nbs= p;   =20 Belchertown, MA  01007  
[413] 323-7803 x13=20 (Voice)           =             &= nbsp;=20 WWW.THEATRIX.NET
[413]=20 323-7805     =20 (FAX)           &n= bsp;         =20
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C05F9C.7DE57320-- --PAA18799.976135917/smtp6.mindspring.com-- ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Wed Dec 06 13:33:02 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143mBR-0001O8-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 13:33:01 -0800 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:32:57 -0500 (EST) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem Message-Id: <200012062132.QAA20547@granger.mail.mindspring.net> To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="QAA20547.976138377/granger.mail.mindspring.net" Subject: KX-T: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: nospamingtheatrix.net: host not found) Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk This is a MIME-encapsulated message --QAA20547.976138377/granger.mail.mindspring.net The original message was received at Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:32:54 -0500 (EST) from bsg-ma1c-196.ix.netcom.com [209.110.250.196] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 550 ... Host unknown (Name server: nospamingtheatrix.net: host not found) --QAA20547.976138377/granger.mail.mindspring.net Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; granger.mail.mindspring.net Received-From-MTA: DNS; bsg-ma1c-196.ix.netcom.com Arrival-Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:32:54 -0500 (EST) Final-Recipient: RFC822; brucek@NOSPAMINGtheatrix.net Action: failed Status: 5.1.2 Remote-MTA: DNS; nospamingtheatrix.net Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:32:57 -0500 (EST) --QAA20547.976138377/granger.mail.mindspring.net Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: Received: from homeoffice (bsg-ma1c-196.ix.netcom.com [209.110.250.196]) by granger.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA07387 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:32:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by homeoffice with XtraMail-SMTP/POP3-Server (v1.2 48220008333) for at Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:55:08 +-500 From: postmaster@theatrix.net To: brucek@NOSPAMINGtheatrix.net Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:55:08 +-500 Subject: Delivery unsuccesful: Delivery problems Message-Id: <001206155508136@homeoffice> --------------- The following address has delivery problems: kxt@kxthelp.com --------------- Part of transaction follows: --> MAIL FROM: <-- 450 ... Sender domain not compliant with RFC 822, section 6.2.7 --------------- Original Message: Received: by homeoffice with XtraMail-SMTP/POP3-Server (v1.2 48220008333) for at Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:55:06 +-500 Message-ID: <000c01c05fcc$1fcbf040$061ba8c0@repair> From: "brucek@theatrix.net" To: Subject: help with programming tool Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:33:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_01C05FA2.36DD7E40" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C05FA2.36DD7E40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (my first post bounced...attempt #2) i have a machine that has been upgraded to windows ME. I now can not = connect using the Panasonic tool: When I try to connect using COM1, it = plugs and chugs and says " DSHS Connect error." If i try to connect = again, it immediately gives me a "Communication port initialize error." = Anyone have any clues?? It used to work just fine. btw, COM1=3D03F8, = IRQ 04. I can still connect to the VMS with COM1. thanks bk ----------------------------------------------------- Bruce Klotz THEATRIX, = Inc.=20 =20 Brucek@NOSPAMINGtheatrix.net 636 Daniel Shays Hwy (Remove NOSPAMING) Belchertown, MA 01007 =20 [413] 323-7803 x13 (Voice) WWW.THEATRIX.NET [413] 323-7805 (FAX) =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C05FA2.36DD7E40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
(my first post bounced...attempt = #2)
 
i have a machine that has been upgraded = to windows=20 ME.  I now can not connect using the Panasonic tool:  When I = try to=20 connect using COM1, it plugs and chugs and says " DSHS Connect=20 error."   If i try to connect again, it immediately gives me a = "Communication port initialize error."  Anyone have any = clues??  It=20 used to work just fine.  btw, COM1=3D03F8, IRQ 04.
 
I can still connect to the VMS with=20 COM1.
 
thanks
bk

-----------------------------------------------------
Bru= ce=20 Klotz           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;           &nbs= p;            = ;  =20 THEATRIX,=20 Inc. 
          = ;            =            =20
     Brucek@NOSPAMINGtheatrix.net=            &nb= sp;  =20 636 Daniel Shays Hwy
   (Remove=20 NOSPAMING)          &nb= sp;           &nbs= p;   =20 Belchertown, MA  01007  
[413] 323-7803 x13=20 (Voice)           =             &= nbsp;=20 WWW.THEATRIX.NET
[413]=20 323-7805     =20 (FAX)           &n= bsp;         =20
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C05FA2.36DD7E40-- --QAA20547.976138377/granger.mail.mindspring.net-- ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Wed Dec 06 15:01:25 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143nYx-0001P3-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:01:23 -0800 Message-ID: <00c701c05fd8$17372b00$13a5bd18@michael850> From: "Michael N. Marcus" To: "Carl Navarro" Cc: References: <703C529E483BD311B44600A0C9D1893C3B1C15@mail.redbrigade.co.za><703C529E483BD311B44600A0C9D1893C3B1C15@mail.redbrigade.co.za> <3.0.6.32.20001206105945.00a2cc88@wcnet.org> Subject: KX-T: Re: KXT 4000 cordless stuff... Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 17:20:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk > I have been sleeping for 6 months or so. What's the deal on the 4000 > cordless stuff? > > Apparently you shell out $500 for a handset and base and then about $150 > retail for additional handsets. It gives you 4 lines and a totally > wireless system with CID. > > Now I ask: > > 1) Range We tested it at 600' in "typical suburban environment." > 2) Sound quality Perfect > 3) features between handsets see http://www.ablecomm.com/ces2000-1.htm > Anybody sold or used one yet? sold hundreds, used one Michael N. Marcus AbleComm, Inc. www.ablecomm.com > > Carl (Rip Van Winkle) Navarro > > > > > > > > > ********************************************************* > * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * > * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * > ********************************************************* > ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Wed Dec 06 15:32:52 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143o3P-0001PX-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:32:51 -0800 From: "David Dyer-Bennet" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14894.52368.867161.408841@gw.dd-b.net> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 17:32:32 -0600 (CST) To: Subject: Re: KX-T: Re: KXT 4000 cordless stuff... In-Reply-To: Michael N. Marcus's message <00c701c05fd8$17372b00$13a5bd18@michael850> of 6 December 2000 References: <703C529E483BD311B44600A0C9D1893C3B1C15@mail.redbrigade.co.za> <3.0.6.32.20001206105945.00a2cc88@wcnet.org> <00c701c05fd8$17372b00$13a5bd18@michael850> X-Mailer: VM 6.63 under Emacs 20.3.1 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Michael N. Marcus writes on 6 December 2000 at 17:20:23 -0500 > > I have been sleeping for 6 months or so. What's the deal on the 4000 > > cordless stuff? > > > > Apparently you shell out $500 for a handset and base and then about $150 > > retail for additional handsets. It gives you 4 lines and a totally > > wireless system with CID. > > > > Now I ask: > > > > 1) Range > We tested it at 600' in "typical suburban environment." > > > 2) Sound quality > Perfect > > > 3) features between handsets > > see http://www.ablecomm.com/ces2000-1.htm > > > > Anybody sold or used one yet? > > sold hundreds, used one These look like a killer for residential installations. While we have more than 8 phones installed, if they were all cordless, we could make do with 8. And I spent a *lot* of time wiring this large two-story building for phones. And this is cheaper even than a 308 plus non-display phones. And it includes voicemail, whereas even a tvs50 is considerable extra money. And a lot of the features of the pbx's are backwards from what you want for home setups; they seem to be all oriented around locations (extensions) and co lines as primary things, whereas what I want to do is all oriented around people. -- David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / dd-b@dd-b.net SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/ Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Wed Dec 06 15:38:58 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143o9I-0001Pq-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 15:38:56 -0800 From: SurfSideSound@aol.com Message-ID: <49.4611ea0.276027e3@aol.com> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 18:38:11 EST Subject: Re: KX-T: 624 chipset To: tony.weiner@mindspring.com CC: kxt@kxthelp.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_49.4611ea0.276027e3_boundary" Content-Disposition: Inline X-Mailer: Unknown sub 148 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk --part1_49.4611ea0.276027e3_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 12/6/00 12:29:02 PM Eastern Standard Time, tony.weiner@mindspring.com writes: > What is the current firmware release for the KXT-624? Where is a > good place to get it from? In the simpler old days you could send > panasonic tech a blank Eprom and they would exchange it for a > programmed one. I suppose that, that does not happen anymore. > > Thanks, > > Tony Weiner > P.C.S., Inc. > Mamaroneck, NY 10543 > 914 698-3689 > > > > Current revision is a -2 system which works with the KX-T7135 backlit display set. Call Valley National Distributors (VND) for details on upgrades 888-201-4030. Steve Martin Surf Side Sound, Inc. --part1_49.4611ea0.276027e3_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 12/6/00 12:29:02 PM Eastern Standard Time,
tony.weiner@mindspring.com writes:


What is the current firmware release for the KXT-624?  Where is a
good place to get it from?  In the simpler old days you could send
panasonic tech a blank Eprom and they would exchange it for a
programmed one.  I suppose that, that does not happen anymore.

Thanks,

Tony Weiner
P.C.S., Inc.
Mamaroneck, NY 10543
914 698-3689



      
Current revision is a -2 system which works with the KX-T7135 backlit display
set.  Call Valley National Distributors (VND) for details on upgrades
888-201-4030.

Steve Martin
Surf Side Sound, Inc. --part1_49.4611ea0.276027e3_boundary-- ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Wed Dec 06 17:47:37 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 143q9o-0001UM-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 17:47:36 -0800 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 16:50:56 -0800 From: Pat Thornton Subject: KX-T: KXT 4000 cordless system X-Sender: pa@pop.sonic.net To: kxt@kxthelp.com Message-id: <3.0.32.20001206165054.006cab54@pop.sonic.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Anybody know how many of the KXT4000 systems you can have in close proximity (i.e. different suites in the same building)? I know on the KXT7890 they say no more than 4, and at least 10 ft. apart. Has anyone tried multiple systems at one location? Thanks, Pat Thornton TeleCom Services Co. 710 S. State St ste.D Ukiah, CA 95482 707 463 2083 voice 707 463 1909 fax pat@tlcm.com ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Thu Dec 07 11:50:53 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144747-0001fI-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:50:51 -0800 Message-ID: <007401c0606b$09228bc0$bc00a8c0@Charles> Reply-To: "Charles Patterson" From: "Charles Patterson" To: "KXT Help" Subject: KX-T: Toll Restriction in NYC Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:30:34 -0500 Organization: Global Communications MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk My customer in Manhattan has requested toll restriction/ verified acct codes for his system. He basically wants employees to be able to call regionally without acct codes, but track ld calls. Does someone have an example of toll restriction lists that can work in Manhattan? I haven't had to deal with TRS on the KXTD's yet so I'm looking for helpful tips. tnx charles Charles Patterson Global Communications Tarrytown, NY charles+AEA-telephonesecurity.com http://www.telephonesecurity.com ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Thu Dec 07 14:51:39 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 1449t4-0001hL-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 14:51:38 -0800 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20001207235148.01affa68@popserver.panix.com> X-Sender: bschmitt@popserver.panix.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 23:51:58 +0100 To: kxt@kxthelp.com From: Bertel Schmitt Subject: KX-T: 816 Upgrade ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk If my ROM version is P401B70327A, what can my 816 be upgraded to? BS ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Thu Dec 07 15:42:18 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144Ag4-0001iK-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:42:16 -0800 Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 17:36:34 -0600 From: Steven Natinsky Subject: KX-T: message waiting lights To: KXT List Message-id: <005001c060a6$898c8820$2c55fea9@swbell.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004D_01C06074.3E8D62E0" X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Priority: 3 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004D_01C06074.3E8D62E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi to all- I have a client with a KXTD308-3 and a TVS50 (self = installed). We cannot get message waiting lights to work. I have checked = all usual suspects- 1. message waiting lights can be lit manually 2. message waiting is enabled in COS, each mailbox has that COS 3. message waiting is enabled in each mailbox 4. mailboxes are not set for "transfer all to mailbox" The DPITS works between the units. A caller can call into the TVS50, = ring an extension, leave a message, etc. but no message waiting light. I = have defaulted both units- still nothing. I have monitered with the PUTD = setting- no sign that the TVS50 is trying to set mw light. Anybody have = any ideas? Regards, Steven Natinsky Pace Comm, Inc. ------=_NextPart_000_004D_01C06074.3E8D62E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi to all- I have a client with a = KXTD308-3 and a=20 TVS50 (self installed). We cannot get message waiting lights = to work.=20 I have checked all usual suspects-
 
1. message waiting lights can be = lit=20 manually
2. message waiting is enabled in COS, = each mailbox=20 has that COS
3. message waiting is enabled in each=20 mailbox
4. mailboxes are not set = for "transfer all to=20 mailbox"
 
The DPITS works between the units. A = caller can=20 call into the TVS50, ring an extension, leave a message, etc. but no = message=20 waiting light. I have defaulted both units- still nothing. I have = monitered with=20 the PUTD setting- no sign that the TVS50 is trying to set mw light. = Anybody have=20 any ideas?
 
Regards,
 
Steven Natinsky
Pace Comm,=20 Inc.
------=_NextPart_000_004D_01C06074.3E8D62E0-- ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Thu Dec 07 16:52:37 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144Bm7-0001j6-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 16:52:35 -0800 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 18:44:04 -0600 From: Sergio Campbell Subject: KX-T: Voice Mail To: kxt@kxthelp.com Reply-to: Sergio Campbell Message-id: <002001c05678$d07d22e0$bd00000a@sergio> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001D_01C05646.85333900" X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Priority: 3 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C05646.85333900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi guys; I got a customer that has a kxtd1232 with a kxvs50, when two calls are = being handled by the voicemail and a third line rings, can i make the = system ring the ext instead of waiting for the voicemail to have a free = port? t.i.a. ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C05646.85333900 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi guys;
 
I got a customer that has a kxtd1232 = with a kxvs50,=20 when two calls are being handled by the voicemail and a third line = rings, can i=20 make the system ring the ext instead of waiting for the voicemail to = have a free=20 port?
 
t.i.a.
------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C05646.85333900-- ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Thu Dec 07 19:48:18 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144EW9-0001lb-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:48:17 -0800 Message-ID: <00d101c060ad$bebadd60$bc00a8c0@Charles> Reply-To: "Charles@telephonesecurity.com" From: "Charles@telephonesecurity.com" To: "Sergio Campbell" , References: <002001c05678$d07d22e0$bd00000a@sergio> Subject: KX-T: Re: Voice Mail Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:28:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk I don't know about this, but could you try putting another extension into the vm ext group? cp ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sergio Campbell" To: Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 7:44 PM Subject: KX-T: Voice Mail Hi guys; I got a customer that has a kxtd1232 with a kxvs50, when two calls are being handled by the voicemail and a third line rings, can i make the system ring the ext instead of waiting for the voicemail to have a free port? t.i.a. ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 08 14:30:01 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144W1f-0001xb-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:29:59 -0800 Message-ID: <000c01c06166$20324de0$0200a8c0@sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com> Reply-To: "Phil Sullivan" From: "Phil Sullivan" To: Subject: KX-T: Ring differences Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:27:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0613C.316E0600" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0613C.316E0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings to all ! With the 1232-4, I know I can station program each phone with 1 of 8 = different rings - but I can't get that "individual ring" to happen when = I do internal calls - only calls through the CO lines seem to have the = specially programmed ring. I am sure this is a simple thing I am = overlooking - any help would be greatly appreciated ! My situation is = that I have 6 phones in a laboratory and the people are often not at = their desk, but in the lab area. They would like to know when their = phone is ringing - even if it is an internal call. ! All phones are KX-T7433. Many thanks in advance ! Phil PS That voice mail port problem I had earlier IS a known problem at = Panaland. On some TVS-200 units, with caller ID activated, if the = caller has their ID blocked, it disables the voicemail port that = answered - and nothing rings ( except at the callers end ). This drove = me nuts for a while because it is such a random problem ! If any of you = have port 165 disappearing - and then coming back at random, this is = probably your problem too. Pana techs had to download new software into = my TVS-200. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0613C.316E0600 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Greetings to all !
 
With the 1232-4, I know I can station = program each=20 phone with 1 of 8 different rings - but I can't get that "individual = ring" to=20 happen when I do internal calls - only calls through the CO lines seem = to have=20 the specially programmed ring.  I am sure this is a simple thing I = am=20 overlooking - any help would be greatly appreciated !  My situation = is that=20 I have 6 phones in a laboratory and the people are often not at their = desk, but=20 in the lab area.  They would like to know when their phone is = ringing -=20 even if it is an internal call. !
 
All phones are KX-T7433.
 
Many thanks in advance !
 
Phil
 
PS  That voice mail port problem I = had earlier=20 IS a known problem at Panaland.  On some TVS-200 units, with caller = ID=20 activated, if the caller has their ID blocked, it disables the voicemail = port=20 that answered - and nothing rings ( except at the callers end ).  = This=20 drove me nuts for a while because it is such a random problem !  If = any of=20 you have port 165 disappearing - and then coming back at random, this is = probably your problem too.  Pana techs had to download new software = into my=20 TVS-200.
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C0613C.316E0600-- ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 08 14:30:10 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144W1o-0001xu-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:30:08 -0800 From: David B. Ptasnik Subject: KX-T: Weird line appearance. To: kxt@kxthelp.com Message-Id: Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:30:02 -0800 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk I have a KXTD 1232-3 with a mix if digital, analog, and 2500's on it. One of the analog extensions (119 if it matters) recently got hosed up. My computer tech was crossing disciplines and putting DSS buttons on everyone's phones, and he didn't understand that the analog phones were different. He ended up removing line 1 from the first button of the phone, and replacing it with a DSS key. I put line 1 back on, but it is now behaving oddly. While it can make calls on the line, as well as put them on hold, and retrieve them from hold, it has not other access to the line. The line does not lite on an incoming ring, or when another user is using the line, or puts the line on hold. If there is an incoming call, and I press the line button, the display reads CO in Use, and denys access to the call. The button stays dark. The same happens to a call that another user has put on hold. I'm sure that some little parameter got set somewhere that I haven't found yet. Any help out there? Dave Americans Adopting Orphans ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 08 14:45:04 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144WGE-0001yI-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:45:02 -0800 Message-ID: <001501c06168$3b9e5860$0200a8c0@sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com> Reply-To: "Phil Sullivan" From: "Phil Sullivan" To: "David B. Ptasnik" Cc: References: Subject: KX-T: Re: Weird line appearance. Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:43:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk When you make an outgoing call on the mystery line, does it light up CO1 on all the other phones ? It sounds like your button 1 is assigned to a different CO than 1. Ergo, you could make calls, but it wouldn't lite or answer calls that come in to CO 1. Phil ----- Original Message ----- From: "David B. Ptasnik" To: Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 5:30 PM Subject: KX-T: Weird line appearance. I have a KXTD 1232-3 with a mix if digital, analog, and 2500's on it. One of the analog extensions (119 if it matters) recently got hosed up. My computer tech was crossing disciplines and putting DSS buttons on everyone's phones, and he didn't understand that the analog phones were different. He ended up removing line 1 from the first button of the phone, and replacing it with a DSS key. I put line 1 back on, but it is now behaving oddly. While it can make calls on the line, as well as put them on hold, and retrieve them from hold, it has not other access to the line. The line does not lite on an incoming ring, or when another user is using the line, or puts the line on hold. If there is an incoming call, and I press the line button, the display reads CO in Use, and denys access to the call. The button stays dark. The same happens to a call that another user has put on hold. I'm sure that some little parameter got set somewhere that I haven't found yet. Any help out there? Dave Americans Adopting Orphans ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 08 14:58:43 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144WTS-0001yg-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:58:42 -0800 Message-ID: <002e01c0614e$7ef06140$bc00a8c0@Charles> Reply-To: "Charles@telephonesecurity.com" From: "Charles@telephonesecurity.com" To: "David B. Ptasnik" , References: Subject: KX-T: Re: Weird line appearance. Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:38:51 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk What steps did you do to put the co button back on? I'm curious, if you really did it properly it should light up. You may have programmed it to be a group co button instead. The steps should be thus: press [program] 99 press the button to program press 0 press 01 (for line 1) press [store] press [program] charles ----- Original Message ----- From: "David B. Ptasnik" To: Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 5:30 PM Subject: KX-T: Weird line appearance. > I have a KXTD 1232-3 with a mix if digital, analog, and 2500's on it. One of the analog extensions (119 if it matters) recently got hosed up. My computer tech was crossing disciplines and putting DSS buttons on everyone's phones, and he didn't understand that the analog phones were different. He ended up removing line 1 from the first button of the phone, and replacing it with a DSS key. I put line 1 back on, but it is now behaving oddly. > > While it can make calls on the line, as well as put them on hold, and retrieve them from hold, it has not other access to the line. The line does not lite on an incoming ring, or when another user is using the line, or puts the line on hold. If there is an incoming call, and I press the line button, the display reads CO in Use, and denys access to the call. The button stays dark. The same happens to a call that another user has put on hold. > > I'm sure that some little parameter got set somewhere that I haven't found yet. Any help out there? > > Dave > Americans Adopting Orphans > > > > ********************************************************* > * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * > * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * > ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 08 15:04:25 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144WYy-0001z4-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:04:24 -0800 Message-ID: <003701c0614f$4a4dd7a0$bc00a8c0@Charles> Reply-To: "Charles@telephonesecurity.com" From: "Charles@telephonesecurity.com" To: "Phil Sullivan" , References: <000c01c06166$20324de0$0200a8c0@sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com> Subject: KX-T: Re: Ring differences Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:44:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk As far as I know, the individual ringing is only for the co's. (someone correct me if I'm wrong). You could try hooking up external ringers on the analog ports for the various extensions, and set them with different tones. thanks for the notes about the caller id, I have a customer with that problem. Charles ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Sullivan" To: Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 5:27 PM Subject: KX-T: Ring differences Greetings to all ! With the 1232-4, I know I can station program each phone with 1 of 8 different rings - but I can't get that "individual ring" to happen when I do internal calls - only calls through the CO lines seem to have the specially programmed ring. I am sure this is a simple thing I am overlooking - any help would be greatly appreciated ! My situation is that I have 6 phones in a laboratory and the people are often not at their desk, but in the lab area. They would like to know when their phone is ringing - even if it is an internal call. ! All phones are KX-T7433. Many thanks in advance ! Phil PS That voice mail port problem I had earlier IS a known problem at Panaland. On some TVS-200 units, with caller ID activated, if the caller has their ID blocked, it disables the voicemail port that answered - and nothing rings ( except at the callers end ). This drove me nuts for a while because it is such a random problem ! If any of you have port 165 disappearing - and then coming back at random, this is probably your problem too. Pana techs had to download new software into my TVS-200. ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 08 15:10:55 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144WfG-0001zN-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:10:54 -0800 From: "Americans Adopting Orphans" To: "Phil Sullivan" Cc: Subject: KX-T: RE: Weird line appearance. Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:11:42 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <001501c06168$3b9e5860$0200a8c0@sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com> Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Hello Phil, Good thought, but it is Line 1. The light does light on the other phones. If it makes a difference, I am using (the delightful) programmator to make the changes. Dave Americans Adopting Orphans > -----Original Message----- > From: Phil Sullivan [mailto:ilml@rcn.com] > Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 2:43 PM > To: David B. Ptasnik > Cc: kxt@kxthelp.com > Subject: Re: Weird line appearance. > > > When you make an outgoing call on the mystery line, does it light > up CO1 on > all the other phones ? It sounds like your button 1 is assigned to a > different CO than 1. Ergo, you could make calls, but it wouldn't lite or > answer calls that come in to CO 1. > > Phil > > ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 08 15:19:33 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144Wnb-0001zk-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:19:31 -0800 Message-ID: <1228961E5564D3118697009027B0D72769400C@psibham.prioritysoftware.com> From: Bob Duffett To: "'Bertel Schmitt'" , kxt@kxthelp.com Subject: RE: KX-T: 816 Upgrade ? Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:19:06 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk P401B70327A in a KX-TD816 is a Dash-1. If the IC20/21 sockets are completely full (ie. 32pin EPROM in a 32pin socket), then that is the last upgrade. I got this info from Panasonic last week when I called with the same question. Bob -----Original Message----- From: Bertel Schmitt [mailto:bschmitt@panix.com] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 4:52 PM To: kxt@kxthelp.com Subject: KX-T: 816 Upgrade ? If my ROM version is P401B70327A, what can my 816 be upgraded to? BS ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Fri Dec 08 18:48:33 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144a3s-00021O-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 18:48:32 -0800 Message-ID: <001501c0618a$5fc1ee60$2cadbd18@computer> From: "JimMarks" To: "David B. Ptasnik" , References: Subject: KX-T: Re: Weird line appearance. Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 21:47:30 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Sounds like it is a group co button with only one line in that group, shut the unit off and then back on and manually program the button to be CO 01.....Its worth a shot?.....jim Jim Marks Denville Wiring Systems New Jersey, USA 973-627-7088 ----- Original Message ----- From: "David B. Ptasnik" To: Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 5:30 PM Subject: KX-T: Weird line appearance. > I have a KXTD 1232-3 with a mix if digital, analog, and 2500's on it. One of the analog extensions (119 if it matters) recently got hosed up. My computer tech was crossing disciplines and putting DSS buttons on everyone's phones, and he didn't understand that the analog phones were different. He ended up removing line 1 from the first button of the phone, and replacing it with a DSS key. I put line 1 back on, but it is now behaving oddly. > > While it can make calls on the line, as well as put them on hold, and retrieve them from hold, it has not other access to the line. The line does not lite on an incoming ring, or when another user is using the line, or puts the line on hold. If there is an incoming call, and I press the line button, the display reads CO in Use, and denys access to the call. The button stays dark. The same happens to a call that another user has put on hold. > > I'm sure that some little parameter got set somewhere that I haven't found yet. Any help out there? > > Dave > Americans Adopting Orphans > > > > ********************************************************* > * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * > * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * > ********************************************************* > ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Sat Dec 09 05:14:35 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144jpi-00029T-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 05:14:34 -0800 Message-ID: <007401c061e1$f74983e0$1301a8c0@wintelrpa6pa0w> From: "nat1" To: Subject: KX-T: TVP50 Connect Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 14:14:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0071_01C061EA.5868F950" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01C061EA.5868F950 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That type of extension occupies the TVP50=20 Thanks Fortunato ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01C061EA.5868F950 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That type of extension occupies the = TVP50=20
Thanks
Fortunato
------=_NextPart_000_0071_01C061EA.5868F950-- ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Sat Dec 09 07:06:34 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144la5-0002AU-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 07:06:33 -0800 From: Eric Kats Subject: KX-T: KX-TD programming software To: kxt@kxthelp.com Message-Id: Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 07:06:30 -0800 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk Can anybody help me, i need a german programming tool for P061 version KX-TD1232. This is not the latest V5.04 i already have. It has to be a german version because of the built-in ISDN card. Thanks Eric eric@katstelecom.nl ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Sat Dec 09 07:59:02 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144mOr-0002BK-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 07:59:01 -0800 From: To: "Phil Sullivan" , Subject: RE: KX-T: Ring differences Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 10:59:56 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C061CF.2A7F8A60" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <000c01c06166$20324de0$0200a8c0@sbo.ma.cable.rcn.com> Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C061CF.2A7F8A60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To pgm a STA 'voice' (distinctive ring).... just follow the same procedure as CO.... Enter STA pgm... (pgm 99) ... then push I-com, then push I-com again.... you'll see the present 'tone-type' ... Then just change it to whatever you want. (Then push 'store') Works with -3 and -4 firmware. Mark <><><> ><><>< <><><> -----Original Message----- From: owner-kxt@nccom.com [mailto:owner-kxt@nccom.com]On Behalf Of Phil Sullivan Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 5:28 PM To: kxt@kxthelp.com Subject: KX-T: Ring differences Greetings to all ! With the 1232-4, I know I can station program each phone with 1 of 8 different rings - but I can't get that "individual ring" to happen when I do internal calls - only calls through the CO lines seem to have the specially programmed ring. I am sure this is a simple thing I am overlooking - any help would be greatly appreciated ! My situation is that I have 6 phones in a laboratory and the people are often not at their desk, but in the lab area. They would like to know when their phone is ringing - even if it is an internal call. ! All phones are KX-T7433. Many thanks in advance ! Phil PS That voice mail port problem I had earlier IS a known problem at Panaland. On some TVS-200 units, with caller ID activated, if the caller has their ID blocked, it disables the voicemail port that answered - and nothing rings ( except at the callers end ). This drove me nuts for a while because it is such a random problem ! If any of you have port 165 disappearing - and then coming back at random, this is probably your problem too. Pana techs had to download new software into my TVS-200. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C061CF.2A7F8A60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To=20 pgm a STA 'voice' (distinctive ring)....    just follow = the same=20 procedure as CO....
Enter STA pgm... (pgm 99) ...   = then push=20 I-com, then push I-com again....  you'll see the present = 'tone-type'=20 ...  Then just change it to whatever you want. (Then push=20 'store')
 
Works with -3 and -4 = firmware.
 
Mark
<><><> =20 ><><><  = <><><>
-----Original Message-----
From: = owner-kxt@nccom.com=20 [mailto:owner-kxt@nccom.com]On Behalf Of Phil = Sullivan
Sent:=20 Friday, December 08, 2000 5:28 PM
To:=20 kxt@kxthelp.com
Subject: KX-T: Ring = differences

Greetings to all !
 
With the 1232-4, I know I can station = program=20 each phone with 1 of 8 different rings - but I can't get that = "individual=20 ring" to happen when I do internal calls - only calls through the CO = lines=20 seem to have the specially programmed ring.  I am sure this is a = simple=20 thing I am overlooking - any help would be greatly appreciated !  = My=20 situation is that I have 6 phones in a laboratory and the people are = often not=20 at their desk, but in the lab area.  They would like to know when = their=20 phone is ringing - even if it is an internal call. !
 
All phones are KX-T7433.
 
Many thanks in advance !
 
Phil
 
PS  That voice mail port problem = I had=20 earlier IS a known problem at Panaland.  On some TVS-200 units, = with=20 caller ID activated, if the caller has their ID blocked, it disables = the=20 voicemail port that answered - and nothing rings ( except at the = callers end=20 ).  This drove me nuts for a while because it is such a random = problem=20 !  If any of you have port 165 disappearing - and then coming = back at=20 random, this is probably your problem too.  Pana techs had to = download=20 new software into my TVS-200.
------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C061CF.2A7F8A60-- ********************************************************* * To unsubscribe, e-mail kxt-request@kxthelp.com * * The KXT-Digest Home Page: http://kxthelp.com/ * ********************************************************* From owner-kxt@nccom.com Sat Dec 09 08:51:27 2000 Received: from majordom by bevo.nccom.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 144nDa-0002C1-00 for kxt-outgoing@nccom.com; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 08:51:26 -0800 Message-ID: <001201c06200$141338e0$0200a8c0@u9h9i3> From: "Randy Dell" To: Subject: Re: KX-T: TVP50 Connect Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 08:50:03 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C061BD.05BD9E40" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-kxt@nccom.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C061BD.05BD9E40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Depends on what KSU and how you have the integration. If your integration is=20 DPITS Digital (1 pair) APITS Hybrid (2 pair) Inband Analogue (1 pair) rd -----Original Message----- From: nat1 To: kxt@kxthelp.com Date: Saturday, December 09, 2000 5:25 AM Subject: KX-T: TVP50 Connect =20 =20 That type of extension occupies the TVP50=20 Thanks Fortunato ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C061BD.05BD9E40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Depends on what KSU and how you have = the=20 integration.
 
If your integration is